Member-only story

Bipartisan Lawmakers, National Security Experts Reject Sanctions Relief and Nuclear Deal with Iran

John Dos Passos

·5.2k Followers· Follow

Published in IRAN The Nuclear Talks Game Played By The Regime: Bi Partisan Lawmakers National Security Experts Reject Sanctions Relief And IRGC S FTO Delisting

3 min read · 3 weeks before

245 View Claps

13 Respond

Save

Listen

In a recent report, bipartisan lawmakers and national security experts have rejected the Biden administration's plans to remove sanctions on Iran and revive the 2015 nuclear deal. The report, titled "Sanctions Relief and the Nuclear Deal: A Dangerous Path," argues that lifting sanctions would embolden Iran and allow it to continue its nuclear weapons program. The report also warns that a new nuclear deal would be weaker than the original agreement and would not prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

The Dangers of Sanctions Relief

The report argues that lifting sanctions on Iran would be a mistake for several reasons. First, it would embolden Iran and allow it to continue its nuclear weapons program. Iran has repeatedly violated the terms of the 2015 nuclear deal, and there is no reason to believe that it would abide by a new agreement. Second, sanctions relief would provide Iran with much-needed financial resources that it could use to fund its terrorist activities and destabilize the Middle East. Third, sanctions relief would send a signal to other countries that the United States is willing to tolerate nuclear proliferation. This could lead to a nuclear arms race in the Middle East and increase the risk of nuclear war.

IRAN-The Nuclear Talks Game Played by the Regime: Bi-partisan lawmakers, national security experts reject sanctions relief and IRGC's FTO delisting

by Sergey Burdin

4.4 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	7527 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	90 pages

The Flaws of the Nuclear Deal

The report also criticizes the Biden administration's plans to revive the 2015 nuclear deal. The report argues that the new deal would be weaker than the original agreement and would not prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. The report also warns that a new deal would be difficult to enforce and could lead to conflict between the United States and Iran.

The Alternative

The report concludes by recommending an alternative approach to dealing with Iran. The report recommends that the United States maintain sanctions on Iran and continue to pressure Iran to abandon its nuclear weapons program. The report also recommends that the United States work with its allies to develop a comprehensive strategy to counter Iran's nuclear threat.

The report "Sanctions Relief and the Nuclear Deal: A Dangerous Path" is a timely and important contribution to the debate over Iran's nuclear program. The report provides a clear and concise analysis of the dangers of sanctions relief and the flaws of the nuclear deal. The report also recommends an alternative approach to dealing with Iran that is more likely to achieve the goal of preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

Call to Action

If you are concerned about the threat posed by Iran's nuclear program, I urge you to read the report "Sanctions Relief and the Nuclear Deal: A Dangerous Path." The report is available for free download at [link to report].

IRAN-The Nuclear Talks Game Played by the Regime: Bi-partisan lawmakers, national security experts reject sanctions relief and IRGC's FTO delisting

by Sergey Burdin

4.4 out of 5